Skip to content

[12.x] Use FQCN for @mixin annotation for consistency #56811

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2025
Merged

[12.x] Use FQCN for @mixin annotation for consistency #56811

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2025

Conversation

AhmedAlaa4611
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR updates the @mixin annotation introduced in #56681 to use the Fully Qualified Class Name for consistency with how @mixin annotation is used throughout the framework.

See

framework/src/Illuminate/Process/Pool.php

Lines 8 to 11 in 262168a

/**
* @mixin \Illuminate\Process\Factory
* @mixin \Illuminate\Process\PendingProcess
*/

framework/src/Illuminate/Queue/Capsule/Manager.php

Lines 10 to 13 in 262168a

/**
* @mixin \Illuminate\Queue\QueueManager
* @mixin \Illuminate\Contracts\Queue\Queue
*/

framework/src/Illuminate/Mail/TextMessage.php

Lines 7 to 9 in 262168a

/**
* @mixin \Illuminate\Mail\Message
*/

@AhmedAlaa4611
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't think the failing test has anything to do with what I'm doing here.

@taylorotwell taylorotwell merged commit 45e5ba2 into laravel:12.x Aug 28, 2025
63 of 65 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@AhmedAlaa4611 @taylorotwell