Skip to content
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
clarifying the language
  • Loading branch information
wareid committed Mar 27, 2023
commit 429314ee98cbd700bb51fdb0e29bdd14f233645c
7 changes: 3 additions & 4 deletions index.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -320,12 +320,11 @@ <h3 id="unacceptablebehavior">
</li>
<li>Patronizing language or behavior:
<ul>
<li>Assuming that people or groups need concepts defined or explained to them.
<li>Intentionally or unintentionally making assumptions about the skills or knowledge of others, such as using language that implies the audience is uninformed on a topic (e.g. interjections like "Well, actually" or "I can't believe you don't know about [topic]").
</li>
<li>Assuming that particular groups of people are technically unskilled (e.g., “So easy your grandmother could do it”).
</li>
<li>Assuming your experience or knowledge on a topic is essential to a discussion, even if it takes discussion off topic or interrupts the flow of the conversation.
<li>Assuming that particular groups of people are technically unskilled due to their characteristics (e.g., “So easy your grandmother could do it”).
Copy link
Contributor

@swickr swickr Apr 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

s/your grandmother/someone with different experience/

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I'd much rather explain why this particular example is problematic than try to change it. This is a pretty common colloquialism too, changing it would take some of the familiarity away.

</li>
<li>Interrupting or repeatedly commenting in conversations with unneccessary clarifications or comments on audience behaviour (e.g. "I don't think you understood my previous comment...", grammar or language corrections that were not invited).</li>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. This is more an example of boorishness or rudeness than of patronizing behavior. I don't think it's a good example to include here.

  2. "I don't think you understood my previous comment" seems to me like a completely appropriate statement for someone to make if that person is feeling not understood, so if it is offered as an example of patronizing behavior I think it needs context to clarify why.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would be strongly opposed to removing this. This is very very common in practice, and it needs to be called out here. It is not just boorish or rude; particularly when repeated, it encourages bad conduct.

</ul>
</li>
<li>Microaggressions, which are small comments or questions, either
Expand Down