Skip to content

feat: Dioxus 0.7 #1258

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

feat: Dioxus 0.7 #1258

wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

marc2332
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@marc2332 marc2332 added this to the 0.4.0 milestone Jun 17, 2025
@marc2332 marc2332 added the enhancement 🔥 New feature or request label Jun 17, 2025
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Benchmark for 2b185b5

Click to view benchmark
Test Base PR %
benchmarks/alignments=true size=21845 depth=8 wide=4 mode=not cached 999.7±21.07µs 963.9±20.94µs -3.58%
benchmarks/size=100001 depth=2 wide=100000 mode=not cached 6.5±0.50ms 6.6±0.50ms +1.54%
benchmarks/size=10001 depth=2 wide=10000 mode=not cached 334.1±140.55µs 328.6±144.66µs -1.65%
benchmarks/size=1001 depth=2 wide=1000 mode=not cached 28.5±27.96µs 28.2±25.42µs -1.05%
benchmarks/size=131071 depth=17 wide=2 mode=not cached 11.5±0.22ms 11.6±0.22ms +0.87%
benchmarks/size=16383 depth=14 wide=2 mode=not cached 950.6±86.12µs 955.8±78.68µs +0.55%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=cached 889.7±13.09µs 865.2±18.90µs -2.75%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=not cached 885.1±55.05µs 882.1±64.05µs -0.34%
benchmarks/size=4095 depth=12 wide=2 mode=not cached 199.8±145.27µs 201.5±160.37µs +0.85%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=cached 701.0±9.96µs 708.6±85.35µs +1.08%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=not cached 714.0±99.04µs 712.5±91.13µs -0.21%

@codecov Codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 75.45%. Comparing base (09b29af) to head (861f2f8).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
crates/components/src/hooks/use_form.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
crates/router/src/hooks/use_router.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
crates/elements/src/macros.rs 66.66% 1 Missing ⚠️
crates/hooks/src/use_popup.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1258      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.45%   75.45%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         286      286              
  Lines       33280    33272       -8     
==========================================
- Hits        25112    25104       -8     
  Misses       8168     8168

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@marc2332 marc2332 moved this to In Progress in Freya Planning Jul 21, 2025
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Benchmark for a846b86

Click to view benchmark
Test Base PR %
benchmarks/alignments=true size=21845 depth=8 wide=4 mode=not cached 1020.8±29.77µs 1089.9±36.05µs +6.77%
benchmarks/size=100001 depth=2 wide=100000 mode=not cached 6.6±0.47ms 7.0±0.67ms +6.06%
benchmarks/size=10001 depth=2 wide=10000 mode=not cached 333.2±136.75µs 332.2±147.87µs -0.30%
benchmarks/size=1001 depth=2 wide=1000 mode=not cached 27.9±25.00µs 28.1±25.00µs +0.72%
benchmarks/size=131071 depth=17 wide=2 mode=not cached 15.4±0.30ms 11.8±0.53ms -23.38%
benchmarks/size=16383 depth=14 wide=2 mode=not cached 966.0±68.06µs 992.5±68.66µs +2.74%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=cached 933.6±121.53µs 888.4±42.72µs -4.84%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=not cached 855.1±49.97µs 953.4±72.48µs +11.50%
benchmarks/size=4095 depth=12 wide=2 mode=not cached 201.3±147.04µs 198.8±140.83µs -1.24%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=cached 684.7±12.39µs 689.6±20.31µs +0.72%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=not cached 698.6±10.48µs 704.9±75.06µs +0.90%

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Benchmark for d7ed084

Click to view benchmark
Test Base PR %
benchmarks/alignments=true size=21845 depth=8 wide=4 mode=not cached 1083.8±73.48µs 1069.6±52.75µs -1.31%
benchmarks/size=100001 depth=2 wide=100000 mode=not cached 7.1±0.53ms 7.1±0.64ms 0.00%
benchmarks/size=10001 depth=2 wide=10000 mode=not cached 328.9±147.20µs 333.4±167.89µs +1.37%
benchmarks/size=1001 depth=2 wide=1000 mode=not cached 28.5±26.16µs 28.5±25.54µs 0.00%
benchmarks/size=131071 depth=17 wide=2 mode=not cached 13.1±0.60ms 12.6±0.57ms -3.82%
benchmarks/size=16383 depth=14 wide=2 mode=not cached 1343.5±132.37µs 1179.5±145.64µs -12.21%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=cached 894.7±54.61µs 1009.5±119.16µs +12.83%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=not cached 889.8±31.72µs 1039.1±112.69µs +16.78%
benchmarks/size=4095 depth=12 wide=2 mode=not cached 198.1±101.82µs 195.5±34.63µs -1.31%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=cached 719.4±26.75µs 743.2±69.05µs +3.31%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=not cached 730.4±112.01µs 757.2±135.69µs +3.67%

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Benchmark for 11cdcfa

Click to view benchmark
Test Base PR %
benchmarks/alignments=true size=21845 depth=8 wide=4 mode=not cached 986.3±30.02µs 1080.5±71.81µs +9.55%
benchmarks/size=100001 depth=2 wide=100000 mode=not cached 6.5±0.50ms 6.6±0.53ms +1.54%
benchmarks/size=10001 depth=2 wide=10000 mode=not cached 331.1±145.62µs 339.4±148.44µs +2.51%
benchmarks/size=1001 depth=2 wide=1000 mode=not cached 28.2±26.71µs 29.0±24.14µs +2.84%
benchmarks/size=131071 depth=17 wide=2 mode=not cached 11.2±0.39ms 11.4±0.21ms +1.79%
benchmarks/size=16383 depth=14 wide=2 mode=not cached 975.3±94.91µs 973.9±56.68µs -0.14%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=cached 850.7±12.94µs 923.3±24.58µs +8.53%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=not cached 889.8±67.66µs 919.4±39.30µs +3.33%
benchmarks/size=4095 depth=12 wide=2 mode=not cached 200.7±138.38µs 204.5±121.90µs +1.89%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=cached 712.1±18.52µs 718.0±11.97µs +0.83%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=not cached 712.1±58.08µs 731.1±107.36µs +2.67%

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Benchmark for c97de27

Click to view benchmark
Test Base PR %
benchmarks/alignments=true size=21845 depth=8 wide=4 mode=not cached 987.0±40.69µs 1007.1±22.26µs +2.04%
benchmarks/size=100001 depth=2 wide=100000 mode=not cached 6.5±0.52ms 6.7±0.59ms +3.08%
benchmarks/size=10001 depth=2 wide=10000 mode=not cached 330.6±143.46µs 331.5±149.74µs +0.27%
benchmarks/size=1001 depth=2 wide=1000 mode=not cached 28.1±25.01µs 28.0±25.08µs -0.36%
benchmarks/size=131071 depth=17 wide=2 mode=not cached 15.0±0.34ms 11.5±0.27ms -23.33%
benchmarks/size=16383 depth=14 wide=2 mode=not cached 957.4±40.57µs 985.8±71.86µs +2.97%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=cached 851.0±42.87µs 928.8±27.09µs +9.14%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=not cached 854.9±33.69µs 956.4±66.95µs +11.87%
benchmarks/size=4095 depth=12 wide=2 mode=not cached 194.7±27.23µs 200.1±114.18µs +2.77%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=cached 675.5±12.67µs 719.9±15.36µs +6.57%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=not cached 659.8±12.22µs 713.9±17.60µs +8.20%

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Benchmark for e9f9a33

Click to view benchmark
Test Base PR %
benchmarks/alignments=true size=21845 depth=8 wide=4 mode=not cached 1078.5±32.52µs 1017.0±45.78µs -5.70%
benchmarks/size=100001 depth=2 wide=100000 mode=not cached 7.2±0.60ms 7.1±0.68ms -1.39%
benchmarks/size=10001 depth=2 wide=10000 mode=not cached 340.0±192.30µs 339.4±196.13µs -0.18%
benchmarks/size=1001 depth=2 wide=1000 mode=not cached 28.6±29.34µs 28.1±26.02µs -1.75%
benchmarks/size=131071 depth=17 wide=2 mode=not cached 12.0±0.42ms 12.0±0.71ms 0.00%
benchmarks/size=16383 depth=14 wide=2 mode=not cached 990.5±81.67µs 980.8±82.44µs -0.98%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=cached 905.5±31.25µs 936.4±41.26µs +3.41%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=not cached 906.4±57.07µs 916.6±66.75µs +1.13%
benchmarks/size=4095 depth=12 wide=2 mode=not cached 202.4±99.67µs 202.2±143.23µs -0.10%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=cached 712.5±13.83µs 719.4±14.78µs +0.97%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=not cached 715.8±56.18µs 723.0±93.22µs +1.01%

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Benchmark for 711760f

Click to view benchmark
Test Base PR %
benchmarks/alignments=true size=21845 depth=8 wide=4 mode=not cached 1075.0±73.11µs 1043.7±48.78µs -2.91%
benchmarks/size=100001 depth=2 wide=100000 mode=not cached 6.6±0.46ms 6.6±0.49ms 0.00%
benchmarks/size=10001 depth=2 wide=10000 mode=not cached 337.2±147.21µs 332.8±143.01µs -1.30%
benchmarks/size=1001 depth=2 wide=1000 mode=not cached 28.3±27.04µs 28.4±26.20µs +0.35%
benchmarks/size=131071 depth=17 wide=2 mode=not cached 11.3±0.29ms 11.5±0.21ms +1.77%
benchmarks/size=16383 depth=14 wide=2 mode=not cached 1004.0±81.48µs 1006.0±79.50µs +0.20%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=cached 889.3±40.77µs 879.4±37.51µs -1.11%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=not cached 962.2±70.47µs 953.7±74.87µs -0.88%
benchmarks/size=4095 depth=12 wide=2 mode=not cached 203.9±141.27µs 200.8±135.87µs -1.52%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=cached 731.5±55.69µs 725.5±47.12µs -0.82%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=not cached 727.8±28.91µs 726.6±128.42µs -0.16%

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Benchmark for 8f155d0

Click to view benchmark
Test Base PR %
benchmarks/alignments=true size=21845 depth=8 wide=4 mode=not cached 2.2±0.12ms 2.1±0.08ms -4.55%
benchmarks/size=100001 depth=2 wide=100000 mode=not cached 9.4±0.80ms 8.4±0.74ms -10.64%
benchmarks/size=10001 depth=2 wide=10000 mode=not cached 353.2±191.07µs 343.0±190.69µs -2.89%
benchmarks/size=1001 depth=2 wide=1000 mode=not cached 29.3±30.09µs 29.3±27.51µs 0.00%
benchmarks/size=131071 depth=17 wide=2 mode=not cached 15.5±0.37ms 14.6±1.20ms -5.81%
benchmarks/size=16383 depth=14 wide=2 mode=not cached 1679.3±131.69µs 1440.2±158.42µs -14.24%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=cached 1498.5±142.42µs 1538.8±151.09µs +2.69%
benchmarks/size=19531 depth=7 wide=5 mode=not cached 1450.9±157.96µs 1351.4±145.39µs -6.86%
benchmarks/size=4095 depth=12 wide=2 mode=not cached 203.8±127.59µs 208.7±148.44µs +2.40%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=cached 1407.8±118.73µs 1231.5±145.39µs -12.52%
benchmarks/size=54241 depth=5 wide=15 mode=not cached 1470.3±154.03µs 1225.5±167.74µs -16.65%

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement 🔥 New feature or request
Projects
Freya Planning
Status: In Progress
Milestone
0.4.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@marc2332